| HOME | Police - Military | True News | What is a Patriot? | New World Order | Links | Mind Control |

Nullify Gun Laws

By Bruce Kettler              Update February 20, 2013
Give this to your County Commissioners              401 Main St. Walsenburg
Give this to your Sheriff                                        525 S. Albert Ave. Walsenburg
Give this to your Police Chief                                500 S. Albert Ave Walsenburg

If you are not in Huerfano County Colorado, you can change the wording on any of the above form letters, to suit your area.


This is an emergency. The nullification must take place immediately. Latest Huerfano County  nullification Information - click here.

Nullification effort is going forward quickly.  Sheriffs all over the US are making statements.

Utah Sheriff group says, “...No federal official will be permitted to descend upon our constituents...” “we are prepared to trade our lives...”

Sheriffs in New Mexico

If you have not yet seen the “fishy” reports coming out of Sandy Hook, please look at the videos on this page.

State Nullification process beginning in Wyoming
Any federal agent "who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States
government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or
privately in Wyoming" would get up to 5 years in prison.
                          Genocide and Gun Control

The Enemy Within


Beaufort County NC goes forward with Nullification

Below recent video interview with Sheriff Richard Mack, who has organized Sheriffs defending the people.
This article gives an overview of the progress of Nullification of firearms rules, around the U.S.
...lawmakers in Texas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Indiana, and other states all filed similar
nullification legislation designed to put the federal government in its place on the gun rights issue.
Gun in front of U.N. Building

United States Program For Disarmament    The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibiition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force

UN Arms Treaty and the Second Amendment


Feinstein Gun Control Bill 2013
         Sheriff Bruce Newman, of Huerfano County CO, takes position on Gun Control - February 5, 2013
This document indicates the position of the Colorado Sheriff’s Of Colorado - which Sheriff Newman is part of, and which he stated he agrees with.
County Sheriffs Of Colorado believes in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms and that this right shall not be infringed... CSOC will not waiver on our defense of the Constitution and will stand to preserve every constituent’s right to possess a firearm.
By Stanislav Mishin

Americans never give up your guns

Pravda   Russian News

These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.
This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.
Various armies, such as the Poles, during the (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.
This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.
Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.
[Comment: For those who serve this system that actually captured the U.S. central government, they will probably not treat you well. History tends to repeat itself. In the end, they would understand you had been deceived, and not one of them, and once no longer deceived you could be a threat to them. ]
Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.
To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room.

Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.
The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?No it is about power and a total power over the people.

There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.